
In the global dry bulk shipping market, effectively balancing the rapid delivery of new vessel capacity with existing port congestion has become a critical issue that industry participants and observers must carefully consider. As the global economy continues to evolve and international trade becomes increasingly complex—particularly after the pandemic's impact—the shipping industry's operational models and demand patterns are undergoing profound transformations.
How the industry responds to new ship deliveries and port congestion will directly affect the operational efficiency of the entire dry bulk shipping market and freight rate levels. Against this backdrop, Birgitte Penntvedt, CEO of Norway's Golden Ocean Group, recently shared insightful perspectives during a speech in Oslo, expressing cautious optimism about current market conditions.
Market Absorption and Capacity Challenges
Penntvedt noted that approximately 10% of global dry bulk shipping capacity can be effectively absorbed when considering port congestion and actual demand in China's coastal trade. This perspective has injected some confidence into the currently turbulent market, demonstrating her keen insight into market demand as an industry leader.
However, Penntvedt didn't overlook the accompanying challenges. She emphasized that to maintain daily rates for capesize vessels—the market's primary ship type—above $20,000, new ship deliveries must decrease by 40%. This suggests that in an oversupplied market, controlling the introduction of new vessels is crucial for stabilizing rate levels.
Financial Performance and Market Resilience
According to provided data, Golden Ocean's net profit in the second quarter dropped significantly to $26.9 million, a 73.4% year-on-year decrease. The primary reason was a sharp increase in charter expenses, which raised overall operating costs by 60% to $93.5 million.
Penntvedt maintained a rational perspective on these results, acknowledging current bottlenecks while recognizing the market's maintained resilience. Indeed, the supply-demand relationship in dry bulk shipping continues to fluctuate, with significant vessel congestion persisting even during periods of lower international logistics demand.
Currently, about 263 dry bulk vessels are delayed at various loading and unloading ports worldwide, representing approximately 5.5% of total capacity. Among these, 119 are capesize vessels, accounting for nearly 11.1% of that category's total capacity. This means that despite declining market demand, reduced port efficiency and increased vessel delays are paradoxically supporting freight rates.
Seasonal Patterns and Chinese Demand
Penntvedt observed that port congestion remains significant even during the summer's lower logistics demand period. She predicts this situation won't improve noticeably in coming years and may worsen during winter months. This forecast is based on research into actual demand in China's coastal trade—an area where industry analysts often underestimate the Chinese market's true demand drivers.
According to relevant analysis reports, China's quarterly coastal dry bulk transport demand reaches 200 million tons, equivalent to about 6% of global dry bulk capacity. This demonstrates the substantial capacity absorption possible during specific periods. Combined with port congestion and China's domestic demand, these two factors will provide lasting market momentum to absorb new vessel deliveries' additional capacity.
Commodity-Specific Outlook
Regarding China's iron ore imports, Penntvedt expressed mild disappointment but showed optimism about coal transport prospects—particularly for thermal and coking coal demand. She noted that European coking coal transport and Japanese coking coal imports have nearly returned to pre-financial crisis levels, while Chinese coking coal demand is growing rapidly. This should help compensate for iron ore transport demand that fell short of expectations.
As a crucial power generation material, coal demonstrates strong competitiveness and promising development prospects in today's market. However, port handling capacity consistently fails to meet importers' deep demand during coal transport market expansion, which will undoubtedly worsen vessel congestion while improving capacity utilization and freight rates.
Fleet Management and Future Projections
Penntvedt identified vessel order backlogs as one of the market's most prominent unstable factors. With slower scrapping rates for older vessels, she anticipates new deliveries must decrease by 40% to maintain global dry bulk fleet utilization above 90%. If realized, this prediction would positively impact capesize daily rates, potentially maintaining them between $20,000-$30,000, with panamax rates between $15,000-$20,000—reflecting relatively strong market levels.
Golden Ocean's statistics show global fleet utilization reached 92.5% in the second quarter. However, continued new vessel deliveries will inevitably reduce this ratio. As the global economy recovers and international trade rebounds, dry bulk shipping's supply-demand relationship will face new tests and challenges.
Conclusion: Resilience and Adaptation
Despite numerous challenges, the dry bulk shipping market continues demonstrating resilience and adaptability. With effective management of new vessel deliveries and port congestion, the industry could achieve a new equilibrium. Shipping companies must maintain prudent vessel investment decisions, enhance operational efficiency, and actively respond to market changes. Meanwhile, policymakers should implement measures to improve port infrastructure and logistics efficiency, adapting to increasingly intense international competition.
Ultimately, the dry bulk shipping market's future is full of changes and opportunities. Only through flexible responses and continuous adjustments can industry participants maintain their competitive positions.