Choosing Shipping Companies and Considerations in Bill of Lading Processing on Southeast Asia Routes

This article discusses the requirements of different shipping companies in the Southeast Asia routes regarding bill of lading processing. It highlights that most shipping companies allow handling according to the actual cargo, reducing the demand for container seal numbers and gross weight. It also emphasizes the importance of confirming the bill of lading processing method with the shipping company before operations to effectively address the complexities in freight forwarding business.
Choosing Shipping Companies and Considerations in Bill of Lading Processing on Southeast Asia Routes

In the freight industry, the processing of bill of lading (B/L) samples represents a crucial step that affects the compliance and legality of the entire cargo transportation process. This is particularly significant in specific regions like Southeast Asian shipping routes, where in-depth research and analysis of different carriers' policies becomes essential.

Recent investigations reveal that numerous regional shipping companies, including Datong, RCL (Regional Container Lines), Korea Marine Transport, King's Highway, and Wan Hai, do not impose mandatory requirements for detailed data such as container/seal numbers or cargo weight/measurements in their B/L sample processing. More specifically, for Southeast Asia operations, carriers like Wan Hai, IAL (International African Lines), TSL (Transworld Shipping Lines), Sinotrans, and SITC (SITC International Holdings Company Limited) generally permit the omission of such data.

This approach reflects these carriers' flexibility and adaptability to customer needs, facilitating more efficient and convenient freight services. In stark contrast stands Yang Ming Marine Transport Corporation (YML), which mandates the provision of cargo details and container/seal information for B/L processing. Freight forwarders and shipping enterprises should take particular note of this requirement to avoid delays or complications caused by incomplete documentation.

International Route Requirements

For other global routes, especially those with European or American destinations, nearly all carriers require advance declaration to destination authorities to comply with import regulations. This critical step ensures transportation legality and compliance, where any oversight could lead to serious legal consequences or cargo seizure risks.

B/L Issuance Methods

Industry-standard B/L signing practices fall into two primary categories:

  • Direct issuance based on B/L confirmation, where some carriers generate documents directly according to trade contract agreements
  • Issuance based on container loading (CBM) data, as practiced by carriers like APL (American President Lines) and CMA (CMA CGM)

The container data method requires freight forwarders and carriers to ensure absolute accuracy in loading information, as it significantly impacts subsequent transportation arrangements and customs clearance procedures.

Operational Recommendations

First-time freight forwarders or clients encountering detailed container data inspections should maintain heightened vigilance and thorough preparation. Before booking shipments, verification of B/L processing methods through customer service hotlines or online support is strongly advised to ensure compliance with carrier requirements and prevent transportation delays or unnecessary financial losses.

In today's rapidly evolving freight industry, proper B/L sample handling directly affects supply chain fluidity. All parties should emphasize the legal nature of bills of lading, data requirements, and operational procedures to mitigate potential legal risks and economic losses. Enterprises must establish comprehensive B/L management mechanisms and review processes to guarantee information authenticity and accuracy, thereby enhancing overall service quality and customer satisfaction.