International shipping congestion at ports in Europe and Latin America continues to worsen. The CEO of Hapag-Lloyd noted that labor disputes in Rotterdam and Antwerp are causing delays, while strong performance in the Brazilian market is exacerbating congestion at South American ports. Cargo owners and freight forwarders need to be aware of this trend and actively plan their logistics strategies.
The severe congestion at Chittagong Port has led to vessel waiting times extending up to 10 days, causing significant overload in the yard. Shipping companies and the freight forwarding industry are suffering massive economic losses, resulting in diminished customer trust and increased operational costs. Freight forwarding enterprises are under pressure, shipping efficiency is declining, and the entire industry urgently needs to optimize its logistics network to tackle these challenges.
The Port Congestion Surcharge (PCS) is an additional fee charged to shippers due to rising costs from busy ports. This fee varies depending on the port and time period, making it essential to consider for accurate logistics cost assessments to avoid economic losses. Specific charges are determined by announcements from shipping companies.
This article explores the concept of Port Congestion Surcharge (PCS) and its impact on logistics costs, analyzing the detailed PCS charges of major shipping companies at various destination ports. This information aids shippers in formulating a reasonable logistics budget and minimizing potential losses. Moreover, the PCS fees vary depending on the port and congestion conditions, necessitating attention to updates from shipping companies.
Norwegian shipping company Golden Ocean Group expects that the dry bulk shipping market can absorb 10% of new vessel capacity due to port congestion and demand for coastal trade in China. Although the number of new ship deliveries needs to be reduced by 40% to maintain high charter rates, the market still shows resilience and potential for growth.
The bulk shipping market outlook is optimistic, with port congestion and domestic demand aiding in the absorption of capacity. New ship deliveries must be managed to stabilize rental rates.
In August and September, a large influx of containers from Asia is expected to flood Nordic ports, leading to severe congestion. Strong import demand will continue to drive shipping volume growth, increasing pressure on operational timelines. Ports and shipping companies need to proactively respond and adjust their strategies to mitigate this challenge.
Despite declining revenues in the shipping market, port congestion remains a persistent issue that is not easily alleviated. Data indicates that a significant number of bulk carriers and container ships continue to wait for loading and unloading, impacting global freight. The congestion problems in the U.S. and Europe have worsened due to the pandemic, economic fluctuations, and labor shortages, serving as a crucial barometer for macroeconomic and geopolitical conditions.
The Port Authority of Qitegang plans to ban 15 vessels from entering the port to alleviate congestion, but this move has met with strong opposition from shipping companies. They believe this measure could worsen operational difficulties, prompting widespread discussions within the industry to explore potential solutions.
This article discusses the phenomenon of liquidation and its handling strategies, emphasizing the complex relationship between liquidation and container pickup. Pickup limitations may occur due to the lack of containers at the yard or shipping companies halting container releases, necessitating appropriate measures based on the situation.
