
WASHINGTON DC/GENEVA
The International Air Transport Association (IATA) and the Salvadoran Airline Representatives Association (ASLA) have jointly expressed serious concerns about El Salvador's recent decision to impose a $3.50 agricultural tariff on all incoming passengers. The aviation organizations warn this measure could hinder the country's aviation recovery and broader economic development.
As the global aviation industry struggles to recover from pandemic impacts, this new tariff adds further strain to an already fragile market. While acknowledging the Salvadoran government's legitimate need to strengthen phytosanitary security and protect agricultural sectors from pests, IATA and ASLA question the timing and potential consequences of this policy.
ASLA President Juan Carlos Ramos emphasized aviation's vital role in connecting El Salvador globally, facilitating trade and tourism. "This tariff might suppress air travel demand, ultimately harming national economic development," Ramos stated.
Discrepancy Between Tariff Revenue and Actual Needs
Industry analysis suggests the tariff could generate $3-4 million annually based on current passenger volumes, but aviation representatives report lacking transparency about risk assessment methodologies or cost calculations. They suspect revenues may exceed actual service requirements, potentially surpassing other government departments' annual incomes.
Ill-Timed During Industry Recovery
The $3.50 charge represents approximately 10% of all airport fees and taxes in ticket prices, potentially increasing travel costs to El Salvador when airlines can least afford demand suppression. Aviation remains among industries hardest hit by pandemic disruptions.
Contradicting Presidential Commitments
The associations highlighted President Nayib Bukele's previous commitments to maintaining aviation competitiveness as an economic recovery driver, suggesting this policy appears inconsistent with those objectives.
Proposed Alternatives
IATA and ASLA offered several alternative approaches:
- Optimizing existing phytosanitary resource allocation
- Enhancing risk assessment systems to focus inspections on high-risk passengers and cargo
- Pursuing international cooperation for phytosanitary challenges
- Implementing differentiated fees based on risk levels
- Improving operational efficiency to reduce costs
The organizations emphasized willingness to provide technical support for implementing alternatives that balance agricultural protection with aviation growth.
Call for Transparent Dialogue
Both associations stressed the importance of establishing open communication channels with the Salvadoran government to collaboratively address challenges and find mutually beneficial solutions.
As global economic conditions remain uncertain, IATA and ASLA urge careful policy evaluation to simultaneously safeguard agricultural security and support aviation's critical role in economic recovery. Continued dialogue aims to reach solutions supporting both objectives.